Chavez Vs Mayweather: Dream Fight Again?
Fans are excited that there could be a fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr and Julio Cesar Chavez. Former three-division world champion Chavez uploaded a funny poster featuring himself and Mayweather Jr., with the caption 'September 16th in Las Vegas.'
Fans have been wanting to see a fight between these boxing stars for years but never got the chance. The fans speculated who would win if Chavez and Mayweather fought.
The question is, would fans be willing to pay to see Mayweather vs. Chavez now? Chavez retired 19 years ago in 2005, and was well past his prime by then. Unlike Mike Tyson, Chavez is looking his age and then some, and he may pass for Mayweather.
A Possible Show in the Works?
The exhibition fight between the two former champions has not been made official, and it is unclear whether this was just a ploy on the part of the 62-year-old Chavez to make himself heard. Mayweather's love of money made the exhibition match possible. However, due to his age, it could be a dangerous fight for Chavez.
15 years older than Mayweather, he has never competed in exhibition matches to stay as busy as he does. The Mexican star will need to pass a physical, and they will need to find a country that will sanction the game.
Chavez and Mayweather were supposed to fight in the mid-1990s when Julio was fighting. However, at that time Mayweather was not a star and the fight would not sell well. The biggest PPV star at the time was Oscar De La Hoya, and he fought Chavez twice.
Floyd fights the show this Saturday, August 24, against John Gotti III, live on DAZN. Whether Mayweather intends to fight Chavez on September 16 is unknown. That would be a quick turnaround for the 47-year-old Mayweather, but he can do it if the money is right.
Mayweather has kept his name in the limelight by performing since his retirement following his fight with former UFC champion Conor McGregor in 2017. Many fans felt that this fight should have been considered an exhibition match, as McGregor made his boxing debut. .
.
Source link